State v. Dixon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that failure to respond to an argument on appeal may be treated as a confession of error
• noting that the circumstances under which the defendant had come to possess the truck, drive it, and attempt to change its color were all subject to scrutiny for weight and credibility
• “We will uphold a restitution award if it bears a reasonable relationship to the loss sustained.”
• “Appeals lie from findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgments, not from ruminations of the trial judge.” (quoting United Cal. Bank v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 140 Ariz. 238, 308 (App. 1983))
• primary goal of statutory interpretation is to determine legislature’s intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lewis
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-07-23· cited 37×
• State v. Hamblin
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-02-06· cited 12×
• State of Arizona v. Victor Kyle Lizardi
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-04-11· cited 11×
• State v. Clow
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2017-03-14· cited 6×
• State v. Young
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-01-14· cited 5×
• State of Arizona v. Pamela Jacqueline Williams
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-02-12· cited 3×
• State v. Reed
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-10-20· cited 1×
• State of Arizona v. Caleb Quixote Lewis
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-07-23
• State of Arizona v. Lance Christian Hamblin
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-02-06
• Cocchia v. Testa
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2023-09-12
• State of Arizona v. Kalill Stubblefield
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2025-12-22