State v. Dixon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “shall” is a mandatory term
• “Rule 48(a) uses the permissive term ‘may dismiss’ rather than a mandatory ‘shall dismiss’ and therefore we view the dismissal motion in this case to have been subject to the trial court’s discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Martinez-Gonzalez
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2012-01-03· cited 19×
• State v. Jacobson
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2010-12-21· cited 5×
• State v. Roth
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2020-02-13· cited 5×
• State v. Diggs
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2005-01-06· cited 1×
• State v. Davis
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2011-12-15
• State v. Brant Lee Eversole
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2015-04-08
• State v. Cook
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2018-08-02