Supreme Court of Kansas· 5/25/1983
State v. Dixon
Citations
- 664 P.2d 286
- 233 Kan. 465
- 1983 Kan. LEXIS 316
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- respondent’s pattern of neglecting clients’ matters in fourteen separate probate proceedings; cases considered spanned more than twenty years
- disciplinary board's recommendations advisory only
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Herd, Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Butler v. Biocore Medical Technologies, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2003-11-04· cited 79×
- Matter of LevineArizona Supreme Court· 1993-02-18· cited 49×
- Biocore Medical Technologies, Inc. v. KhosrowshahiD. Kansas· 1998-09-04· cited 38×
- In Re IlluzziSupreme Court of Vermont· 1993-07-30· cited 11×
- In Re FarmerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-12-12· cited 7×
- Board of Professional Responsibility, Wyoming State Bar v. FultonWyoming Supreme Court· 2006-04-20· cited 5×
- In Re JenkinsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1994-07-08· cited 4×
- State v. ChartierSupreme Court of Kansas· 1984-02-08· cited 1×
- State v. ChartierSupreme Court of Kansas· 1983-10-21
- In re PowersSupreme Court of Kansas· 1986-06-13
- In re ValdezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2025-08-29
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. AlveySupreme Court of Kansas· 1974-07-17· cited 24×
- In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KennedyWashington Supreme Court· 1982-08-05· cited 23×
- Mendicino v. MagagnaWyoming Supreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 6×
- State Bar Grievance Administrator v. GrubbsMichigan Supreme Court· 1976-04-01· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.