State v. Diol
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 3120
Syllabus
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL—PROCEDURE/RULES —COUNSEL: The common pleas court abused its discretion in denying defendant's Crim.R. 32.1 motion to withdraw his guilty pleas: defendant sustained his burden of demonstrating a prejudicial deficiency in his trial counsel's advice concerning the removal consequence of his guilty pleas and thus demonstrated that withdrawal of the pleas was necessary to correct a manifest injustice. Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010).
Judges: Winkler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 11,299×
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court· 2010-03-31· cited 5,017×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1977-03-23· cited 1,253×
- Jae Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2017-06-23· cited 1,099×
- State v. MorrisOhio Supreme Court· 2012-06-05· cited 478×
- State v. HillOhio Supreme Court· 1967-12-20· cited 61×
- State v. Romero (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-05-15· cited 58×
- State v. Bozso (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-07-23· cited 18×
- State v. DiolOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-05· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.