Skip to main content
· 12/8/1998

State v. Dinmore

Citations

  • 91 Haw. 138
  • 980 P.2d 1012
  • 1998 Haw. App. LEXIS 220

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that the question of whether the debtor has acted in bad faith is a factual determination subject to review by this Court under a \clearly erroneous\ standard
  • determining that the question of whether the debtor has acted in bad faith is a factual determination subject to review by this Court under a “clearly erroneous” standard
  • proper notice turns on propriety of procedures used, not subjective lack of knowledge of property owner
  • “Since the appellant’s only challenge to the validity of the loan guaranty indebtedness is his allegation of inadequate notice, the Court holds that the loan guaranty is valid”
  • notice procedures used must meet the “objective propriety” test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.