· 12/8/1998
State v. Dinmore
Citations
- 91 Haw. 138
- 980 P.2d 1012
- 1998 Haw. App. LEXIS 220
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that the question of whether the debtor has acted in bad faith is a factual determination subject to review by this Court under a \clearly erroneous\ standard
- determining that the question of whether the debtor has acted in bad faith is a factual determination subject to review by this Court under a “clearly erroneous” standard
- proper notice turns on propriety of procedures used, not subjective lack of knowledge of property owner
- “Since the appellant’s only challenge to the validity of the loan guaranty indebtedness is his allegation of inadequate notice, the Court holds that the loan guaranty is valid”
- notice procedures used must meet the “objective propriety” test
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.