State v. Dinkel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a defendant who cannot argue lack of mens rea may still argue, when appropriate, that the voluntary act or omission requirement of the actus reus was not met

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Vonachen
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2020-12-04· cited 34×
• State v. Dinkel
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2021-09-24· cited 19×
• State v. Stanley
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2020-12-23· cited 18×
• State v. Turner
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2024-02-02· cited 10×
• In re Wrongful Conviction of Spangler
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2024-04-26· cited 7×
• State v. Genson
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2020-12-18· cited 5×
• State v. Burris
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2024-03-15

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Russ
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2019-06-28· cited 8×
• Corvias Military Living, LLC v. Ventamatic, Ltd.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2019-10-25· cited 6×
• State of Maine v. Michael J. Siracusa Jr.
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2017-05-04· cited 3×