State v. Dinkel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the defendant’s argument that, “because [the victims] inside the house were not taken beyond the house or moved a substantial distance, they were not kidnapped as that term is used in ORS 163.225(l)(a
• victims moved from one room of house to another

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Roy Branch v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent Oregon State Penitentiary
  Ninth Circuit· 1984-06-29· cited 20×
• State v. Papineau
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-07-06· cited 19×
• State v. Linthwaite
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-05-26· cited 15×
• State v. Montgomery
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-02-09· cited 12×
• State v. Washington
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-08· cited 12×
• James Richard Allbee v. Hoyt C. Cupp
  Ninth Circuit· 1983-09-20· cited 6×
• State v. Wolfe
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-01-19· cited 5×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-02-21· cited 5×
• State v. Jefferson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-12-23· cited 4×
• State v. Tuan Anh Nguyen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-07-30· cited 4×
• State v. Rendahl
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-08-25· cited 2×
• State v. Scovell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-12-04· cited 1×