State v. Dinagen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• impermissible admission of mug shots, from which jury could infer prior criminal behavior, was not prejudicial when state presented strong evidence of the defendant’s guilt
• nonconstitutional error, is harmless if ‘“it is not reasonably possible that such evidence would influence an average jury on the ultimate issue of guilt or innocence’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).