State v. Dillon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• hold- ing that the evidence was insufficient to show protracted impairment of health where the victim denied experiencing any pain caused by a bullet fragment and where the doctor testified only that the fragment could possibly affect the vic- tim’s nerves

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Talmage L. Ellis v. Nicholas Armenakis
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-08-25· cited 18×
• State in Interest of Besendorfer
  Utah Supreme Court· 1977-08-09· cited 14×
• State v. Stone
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-06-07· cited 14×
• State v. McWilliams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-04-11· cited 13×
• State v. Rainwater
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1976-08-30· cited 10×
• State v. Britt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-09-18· cited 2×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Magers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1899-11-13· cited 53×
• State v. Mayo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-06-18· cited 21×
• State of Oregon v. Patton
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1956-11-08· cited 18×
• State v. Hale
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1975-07-14· cited 11×
• State v. Dazhan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-11-13· cited 11×