Skip to main content

State v. Dilley

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 3574

Syllabus

Petition for postconviction relief R.C. 2953.23 newly discovered evidence res judicata. The trial court did not err or abuse its discretion in denying appellant's untimely and successive petition for postconviction relief. Appellant's claims either were or should have been raised in his direct appeal or first petition for postconviction relief. Accordingly, appellant's claims are barred by res judicata.

Judges: Celebrezze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.