State v. Dilley
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 3574
Syllabus
Petition for postconviction relief R.C. 2953.23 newly discovered evidence res judicata. The trial court did not err or abuse its discretion in denying appellant's untimely and successive petition for postconviction relief. Appellant's claims either were or should have been raised in his direct appeal or first petition for postconviction relief. Accordingly, appellant's claims are barred by res judicata.
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. CalhounOhio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 1,479×
- State v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 802×
- State v. GondorOhio Supreme Court· 2006-12-26· cited 691×
- State v. SzefcykOhio Supreme Court· 1996-11-13· cited 645×
- State v. Apanovitch (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-11-29· cited 208×
- State v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court· 2008-04-09· cited 92×
- State v. CressOhio Supreme Court· 2006-12-27· cited 55×
- State v. DilleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-10· cited 7×
- State v. DilleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-15· cited 4×
- State v. DilleyOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-19· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.