Skip to main content

State v. Dillard

Citations

  • 31 A.3d 880
  • 132 Conn. App. 414
  • 2011 Conn. App. LEXIS 577

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ‘‘[t]his court consistently has declined to conclude that the admis- sion of evidence was unduly prejudicial when the prior acts of misconduct were substantially less shocking than the crimes charged’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bear, Espinosa, Schaller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.