State v. Dill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• conduct is gross and flagrant where “[ejven an experienced prosecutor knows” that insinuating addiction to narcotics is improper
• conduct is gross and flagrant where \[e]ven an experienced prosecutor knows\ that insinuating addiction to narcotics is improper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bunyard
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2006-04-28· cited 59×
• Walters v. Hitchcock
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1985-04-05· cited 36×
• State v. Moore
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1987-07-17· cited 17×
• State v. Croft
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1981-11-13· cited 7×
• State v. Carpenter
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1980-07-18· cited 4×
• Bullock v. BNSF Railway Co.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2017-08-04
• State v. Gowler
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1982-05-06

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Chapman v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
• Griffin v. California
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-28· cited 4,680×
• Griffin v. California
  Supreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,088×
• State v. Gustin
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1973-06-09· cited 71×
• State v. Wilson & Wentworth
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1977-01-22· cited 65×
• State v. Thompson
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1976-12-11· cited 57×
• State v. Baker
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1976-05-08· cited 43×
• State v. Hamilton
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1977-05-14· cited 18×
• State v. Reeves
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1978-05-06· cited 13×
• State v. Ferris
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1977-06-11· cited 11×