Skip to main content

State v. Dildine

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 1771

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in sentencing the defendant-appellant to maximum consecutive sentences. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Judges: Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.