Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 6/29/2012
State v. Dilboy
Citations
- 163 N.H. 760
- 48 A.3d 983
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[A]lthough we review whether a statement is testimonial de novo, in this case we have no specific statements to review because the documents, or other evidence, that constitute the ‘test results’ were never submitted into the record.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Conboy, Dalianis, Hicks, Lynn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 2,882×
- Bullcoming v. New MexicoSupreme Court· 2011-06-23· cited 1,225×
- Whorton v. BocktingSupreme Court· 2007-02-28· cited 725×
- State v. O'MALEYSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2007-09-05· cited 26×
- Appeal of BosselaitSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1988-07-08· cited 21×
- State v. SilvaSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2008-11-20· cited 14×
- State v. MichelsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2010-05-07· cited 12×
- State v. ParraSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-03-09· cited 11×
- Burke v. PierroSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2009-12-16· cited 8×
- State v. DilboySupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2010-04-20· cited 8×
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2011-09-22· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.