State v. DiFrancisco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the test for prejudice in the ineffective assistance analysis is equivalent to the test for harm in plain error review” (citation and punctuation omitted)
• “[T]he test for prejudice in the ineffective assistance analysis is equivalent to the test for harm in plain error review.”
• “Even if opportunity could be inferred, nothing linked this third party to the murder.” (cleaned up)
• “[T]he test for prejudice in the ineffective assistance analysis is equivalent to the test for harm in plain error review.”
• “[I]t was for the jury to determine the credibility of the eyewitnesses.”
• plain error review established in OCGA § 17-8-57 (b) applies retroactively

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).