State v. Dick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Medical records are considered reliable and are specifically excluded from the hearsay rule by Minn. R. Evid. § 803(4)
• Medical records are considered reliable and are specifically excluded from the hearsay rule by Minn. R. Evid. § 803(4)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Wicka
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-12-14· cited 7×
• State v. Fidel
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-02-13· cited 7×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Kindem
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-12-07· cited 267×
• State v. Leinweber
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1975-04-04· cited 128×
• State v. Back
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1983-12-09· cited 96×
• Bellcourt v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-06-27· cited 62×
• State v. Blanchard
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-02-05· cited 54×
• State v. Morales
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-10-01· cited 53×
• State v. Lee
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-08-03· cited 36×
• State v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-02-24· cited 30×
• State v. Posten
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-01-30· cited 24×
• State v. Matthews
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-09-06· cited 21×
• State v. Morgan
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1980-07-03· cited 16×
• State v. Baker
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-07-05· cited 14×
• State v. Harvey
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1979-01-26· cited 9×