Supreme Court of Louisiana· 9/5/1978
State v. Dick
Citations
- 362 So. 2d 547
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- when informant is present at suppression hearing to testify on behalf of defendant's Franks challenge, it is error to curtail defense counsel's examination of informant on the grounds of privilege
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marcus
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BonannoSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1979-06-25· cited 50×
- State v. BoothLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1984-03-26· cited 10×
- State v. GotroSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1988-10-14· cited 7×
- State v. AddisonLouisiana Court of Appeal· 2004-06-29· cited 5×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1988-10-14· cited 4×
- State v. CasalCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-07-23· cited 2×
- State v. GainesSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1988-10-14· cited 2×
- State v. RaneySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1988-10-14· cited 1×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-03-25· cited 3,599×
- State v. CrosbySupreme Court of Louisiana· 1976-11-03· cited 1,765×
- State v. SheppardSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1977-09-19· cited 160×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1977-01-24· cited 59×
- State v. De La BeckwithSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1977-02-28· cited 41×
- State v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1977-09-19· cited 22×
- State v. HelmkeSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1977-10-10· cited 2×
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1978-09-05· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.