Supreme Court of Rhode Island· 2/20/1995
State v. Diaz
Citations
- 654 A.2d 1195
- 1995 R.I. LEXIS 42
- 1995 WL 68985
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a process of logical deduction through a series of inferences from established circumstantial facts may be probative
- enumerating factors for determining whether a Fourth Amendment seizure has occurred, including “the belief of a reasonable, innocent person in identical circumstances; and * * * whether the person had the option of not accompanying the police”
- “The record is devoid of any evidence that defendant did not voluntarily accompany the police to the station.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lederberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Wilson-Bey v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-07-20· cited 149×
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2000-01-26· cited 57×
- State v. OteroSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2002-01-24· cited 54×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa· 1996-04-17· cited 48×
- State v. RosSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2009-07-01· cited 43×
- State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2000-07-17· cited 36×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1999-11-24· cited 33×
- State v. MiddletonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2007-01-08· cited 31×
- State v. JimenezSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2011-12-14· cited 25×
- State v. HornoffSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2000-10-24· cited 17×
- State v. LambertSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1997-12-22· cited 14×
- State v. GrantSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2008-05-13· cited 14×
- State v. UrenaSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2006-06-16· cited 12×
- State v. BrezinskiSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1999-06-21· cited 11×
- State v. DelestreSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2012-01-12· cited 11×
- State v. VieiraSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2007-01-16· cited 7×
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1999-12-03· cited 6×
- Hector Jaiman v. State of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2012-11-16· cited 4×
- State v. Gary GaudreauSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2016-06-17· cited 4×
- State v. BulginSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2004-04-09· cited 3×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
- State v. CaruoloSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1987-04-23· cited 112×
- United States v. Raymond JohnsonSecond Circuit· 1975-04-01· cited 102×
- Johnson v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1952-04-04· cited 99×
- State v. MariniSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1994-03-08· cited 79×
- State v. RoddySupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1979-04-25· cited 77×
- State v. HenshawSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1989-04-25· cited 69×
- State v. DameSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1989-06-20· cited 63×
- State v. GazerroSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1980-09-17· cited 50×
- State v. GrabowskiSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1994-06-22· cited 39×
- In Re DerekSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1982-07-23· cited 31×
- State v. LeuthavoneSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1994-04-14· cited 27×
- State v. AmazeenSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1987-06-02· cited 22×
- State v. GriffithSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1992-06-26· cited 18×
- State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1984-02-02· cited 16×
- Curtin v. LatailleSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1987-07-01· cited 14×
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1990-06-19· cited 13×
- State v. KennedySupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1990-02-08· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.