State v. Devine
Citations
- 6 Wash. 587
- 34 P. 154
- 1893 Wash. LEXIS 341
Syllabus
<p>INFORMATION — SUFFICIENCY OF — VERIFICATION BEFORE DEPUTY COUNTY CLERK.</p> <p>An information is sufficient to show that the prosecution is in the name of the state when the caption of the information entitles the case as the “State of Washington against” the defendants, naming them.</p> <p>When the verification to an information is made by the prosecuting attorney before the deputy county clerk, it is proper that the jurat should be signed by such officer in his own name; and it is unnecessary that he sign, in such case, in the name of his principal by himself as deputy.</p>
Judges: Hoyt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Huber v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1910-03-25· cited 22×
- Halbouer v. CueninSupreme Court of Colorado· 1909-04-15· cited 14×
- State v. RosenerWashington Supreme Court· 1894-01-09· cited 8×
- State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court· 1895-07-26· cited 4×
- State v. WinneSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1922-06-27· cited 2×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Touchard v. CrowCalifornia Supreme Court· 1862-07-01· cited 32×
- Westbrook v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court· 1885-01-28· cited 22×
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1889-01-28· cited 16×
- Muller v. BoggsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1864-07-01· cited 13×
- Calender v. OlcottMichigan Supreme Court· 1849-01-15· cited 10×
- State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1889-01-21· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.