State v. Desirey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court impermissibly struck defendant's motion to dismiss on the basis of defendant's failure to appear without considering the merits
• holding that, when defendant failed to appear at scheduled suppression hearing, the “court could have decided the motion in defendant’s absence, but it did not have the authority to refuse to consider it”
• when defendant failed to appear at scheduled suppression hearing, “[t]he court could have decided the motion in defendant’s absence, but it did not have the authority to refuse to consider it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Robinson v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-11-14· cited 22×
• State v. Fox
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-01-26· cited 5×
• State v. Edwards
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-10-28· cited 4×
• Smolka v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 2015-06-23· cited 3×
• State v. Ruperd
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 2009-02-06· cited 1×
• State v. McMichael
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-07-31

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Miller
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1974-08-01· cited 44×