Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 8/24/2007
State v. Deschenes
Citations
- 931 A.2d 558
- 156 N.H. 71
- 2007 N.H. LEXIS 146
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing whether prior conviction was inherently horrifying even though trial court did not expressly address first prong of prejudicial effect test
- number of prior convictions may evince the degree to which defendant’s contempt for the law is abiding and repeated
- repeat convictions for same or similar offenses within nine-month time frame could be especially probative of trustworthiness, even when such convictions occurred nearly ten years earlier
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Broderick, Dalianis, Duggan, Galway, Hicks
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Commonwealth v. DiGiambattistaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2004-08-16· cited 167×
- Commonwealth v. DagleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2004-10-26· cited 49×
- State v. AyerSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2006-12-07· cited 40×
- People v. BuckAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-10-31· cited 31×
- State v. BarnettSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-12-21· cited 31×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-06-03· cited 18×
- State v. SkidmoreSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-12-30· cited 15×
- State v. DemerittSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2002-10-21· cited 13×
- State v. WallSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2006-10-13· cited 11×
- State v. FarrellSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-01-29· cited 11×
- State v. CassellSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-10-24· cited 7×
- Zola v. KelleySupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-07-01· cited 6×
- State v. McGillSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2006-08-01· cited 5×
- State v. PlaceSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2005-05-20· cited 4×
- State v. GaunttSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2006-09-28· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.