Ohio Court of Appeals· 4/19/2021
State v. Derifield
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 1351
Syllabus
The search warrant authorized on appellant's residential was not improper, as the inferences contained therein were either permissible inferences made by the detective or were not made intentionally or with conscious indifference.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BurnsideOhio Supreme Court· 2003-10-22· cited 2,261×
- State v. MadrigalOhio Supreme Court· 2000-01-05· cited 1,280×
- State v. GeorgeOhio Supreme Court· 1989-09-27· cited 672×
- State v. CastagnolaOhio Supreme Court· 2015-04-28· cited 136×
- State v. VoreOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-15· cited 40×
- State v. VundaOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-11· cited 37×
- State v. DuganOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-02-11· cited 21×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-09-02· cited 12×
- State v. J.A.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-01-29· cited 12×
- State v. ThackerOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-06· cited 10×
- State v. Saracco-RiosOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-10-03· cited 9×
- State v. ManningOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-20· cited 8×
- State v. PoffOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-11· cited 6×
- State v. RisnerOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-23· cited 5×
- State v. Pichardo-ReyesOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-13· cited 4×
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-04· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.