Skip to main content
· 12/18/2014

State v. Derek Michael Arrotta

Citations

  • 157 Idaho 773
  • 339 P.3d 1177
  • 2014 Ida. LEXIS 340

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that under Idaho implied-consent laws, a suspected drunken driver can withdraw his or her consent to test for the presence of alcohol
  • concluding that under Idaho implied-consent laws, a suspected drunken driver can withdraw his or her consent to test for the presence of alcohol
  • “A suspect can withdraw his or her statutorily implied consent to a test for the presence of alcohol.”
  • “A suspect can withdraw his or her statutorily implied consent to a test for the presence of alcohol.”
  • “A suspect can withdraw his or her statutorily implied consent to a test for the presence of alcohol.”
  • “In [McNeely], the United States Supreme Court did not address whether implied consent could be withdrawn, undoubtedly because the Missouri Supreme Court did not address the State’s arguments based upon its implied consent law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eismann, Burdick, Jones, Horton, Walters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.