State v. Derby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State of Oregon, 331 Or 634, 659-60, 20 P3d 180 (2001
• “For an officer’s belief to be objectively rea- sonable, the facts, as the officer perceives them, must actu- ally constitute a traffic violation.”
• “If a driver is moving forward in a clearly marked lane, any deviation from the lane—except possibly a truly de minimis one—may constitute failure to maintain a lane.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Little
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-07-06· cited 11×
• State v. Redding
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2023-04-05· cited 3×
• State v. Mendell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-06-26
• Pringle Square, LLC v. Berrey Family, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-08-18
• Godon v. Bend-CDJR, LLC
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-04-01

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ball v. Gladden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
• State v. Ehly
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 660×
• Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-03-08· cited 428×
• State v. Miller
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-08-14· cited 41×
• State v. Matthews
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-12-02· cited 39×
• State v. Tiffin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-10-12· cited 32×
• State v. McBroom
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-01-23· cited 28×
• State v. Lunacolorado
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-11-17· cited 21×
• State v. Lovaina-Burmudez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-06-05· cited 21×
• State v. Grover
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-04-28· cited 6×
• State v. Castillo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-11-28· cited 6×
• State v. Ordner
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-26· cited 3×