State v. Denny

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing suppression under ORS 810.410; remanding for determination of constitutionality of seizure because issue may depend on factual determinations that must be made at the trial court level
• remand required where trial court did not consider the issue of consent, which was critical to resolution of the defendant’s constitutional argument as relevant under ORS 136.432

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Williams
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-06-09· cited 17×
• State v. Hall
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-03-22· cited 10×
• State v. Duffy
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-08-15· cited 6×
• State v. Manivong
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-06-02· cited 1×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hitz
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-12-20· cited 253×
• State v. Dominguez-Martinez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-06-02· cited 88×
• Barcik v. Kubiaczyk
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-05-25· cited 82×
• State v. Fugate
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-06-24· cited 31×
• State v. Fugate
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-10-28· cited 25×
• State v. Cruz-Aguirre
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-01-06· cited 12×
• State v. Sulser
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-03-23· cited 12×
• State v. Robinson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-02-17· cited 11×
• State v. Underwood
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-07-27· cited 8×
• State v. Wood
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-07-02· cited 7×
• State v. Jaehnig
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-02-17· cited 5×
• State v. Underwood
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-09-08· cited 4×