Skip to main content

State v. Dennison

Citations

  • 571 N.W.2d 492
  • 1997 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 340
  • 1997 WL 732159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a defendant’s detention for the purpose of performing field sobriety tests and the invocation of the implied consent procedures do not require an arrest
  • holding arrest does not occur under the speedy indictment rule when police have authority to detain a person by transporting the person to the police station to invoke the implied-consent procedures
  • holding a defendant's arrest for driving while revoked and having an open container did not bar the State from filing OWI charge, stemming from the same incident, more than forty-five days later
  • holding a defendant’s arrest for driving while revoked and having an open container did not bar the State from filing OWI charge, stemming from the same incident, more than forty-five days later
  • finding it “significant that the officers did not issue a citation or complaint charging Dennison with OWI” on the date of the arrest
  • noting the officer informed the defendant he was under arrest for driving while his license was revoked and open container

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter, Harris, Larson, Lavorato, Snell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.