State v. Denney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• unambiguous criminal order cannot be later modified to match “what the judge may have intended”
• even though court may have intended to impose two eighteen-month probation periods, probation terminated by operation of law eighteen months after imposition, absent extension, revocation or unambiguously-stated consecutive terms of probation for different offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hodges
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1990-08-31· cited 42×
• State v. Perkins
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2014-03-20· cited 8×
• State v. Moya
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1991-07-17· cited 6×
• State v. McDonald
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2005-02-25· cited 4×
• State v. Candedo
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2008-01-04· cited 4×
• State v. Gutierrez
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2015-02-05· cited 4×
• C.S.B. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2000-12-14

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Daugherty
  Supreme Court· 1926-01-04· cited 220×
• State v. Garcia
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1983-02-03· cited 51×
• State v. Green
  Utah Supreme Court· 1988-06-14· cited 29×
• Chase v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1971-01-07· cited 12×