State v. Dengolensky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a violation of Rule 1.7 where a fundamental conflict existed between the respondent's role as guardian ad litem for the children and his role as advocate for their father in a criminal matter
• Rule 1.7 permits attorney to represent client despite possible conflict when client is informed of conflict and consents to representation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).