Skip to main content
· 9/21/1983

State v. Dendurent

Citations

  • 669 P.2d 361
  • 64 Or. App. 575
  • 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 3451

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the argument that “ ‘all persons are entitled to an initial diversion’ is * * * patently incorrect”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillette, Young

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.