State v. Denato

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for hearing on factual situation involving disclosure of informant’s identity because it was “impossible for us to knowingly resolve the issue” on appeal
• remanding for hearing on factual situation involving disclosure of informant's identity because it was \impossible for us to knowingly resolve the issue\ on appeal
• stating the balancing test for disclosure “ ‘depend[s] on the particular circumstances of each case, taking into consideration the crime charged, the possible defenses, the possible significance of the informer’s testimony, and other relevant factors’ ” (citation omitted
• stating the balancing test for disclosure “ ‘depend[s] on the particular circumstances of each case, taking into consideration the crime charged, the possible defenses, the possible significance of the informer’s testimony, and other relevant factors’ ” (citation omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).