State v. DeMosse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting “award” as used in the interest provision of RSA 281-A:44 to include medical benefits
• in workers’ compensation cases, parties’ rights and liabilities determined by the law in force at the time of the injury
• “Words used with plain meaning in one part of a statute are to be given the same meaning in other parts of the statute, unless a contrary intention is clearly shown.” (quotation omitted)
• “Words used with plain meaning in one part of a statute are to be given the same meaning in other parts of the statute, unless a contrary intention is clearly shown.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).