State v. Delp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding, as a matter of first impression, that defendant did not have protected privacy interest, under Oregon Constitution, in noncontent subscriber information held by his internet service provider
• whether a protected privacy right in a particular thing exists is a legal, rather than factual, conclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Hauskins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-07-05· cited 25×
• State v. Carle
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-08· cited 11×
• State v. Sparks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-11-26· cited 11×
• State v. Kelley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-01· cited 6×
• State v. Hernandez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-04-24· cited 6×
• State v. OFODRINWA
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-03-02· cited 5×
• State v. Bellar
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-09-30· cited 5×
• State v. Combest
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-05-13· cited 5×
• State v. Moreno
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-01-27· cited 5×
• Hardin v. Popoff
  Multnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-06-29· cited 5×
• State v. Delp
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2019-04-10· cited 4×
• State v. Ghim
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-10· cited 2×
• State v. McCrary
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-22