· 2/2/1988
State v. Delosantos
Citations
- 13 Conn. App. 386
- 536 A.2d 609
- 1988 Conn. App. LEXIS 35
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- voluntary absence of husband who deserted family didn’t destroy homestead character of residence
- voluntary absence of husband who deserted family didn’t destroy homestead character of residence
- voluntary absence of husband who deserted family didn’t destroy homestead character of residence
- “[I]t is true that one person or one family may not have two homesteads at one time.” Husband’s voluntary absence from family home or abandonment of wife did not destroy the homestead character of family residence
- “[I]t is true that one person or one family may not have two homesteads at one time.” Husband’s voluntary absence from family home or abandonment of wife did not destroy the homestead character of family residence
- “[I]t is true that one person or one family may not have two homesteads at one time.” Husband’s voluntary absence from family home or abandonment of wife did not destroy the homestead character of family residence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Connell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.