Skip to main content
· 11/1/1990

State v. Delarosa-Flores

Citations

  • 799 P.2d 736
  • 59 Wash. App. 514
  • 1990 Wash. App. LEXIS 401

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding no abuse of discretion in allowing recess conference between prosecutor and victim even though victim changed testimony after conference because opposing counsel could have attacked that change on cross-examination
  • finding no abuse of discretion in allowing recess and conference between prosecutor and victim when victim changed testimony after conference
  • finding no abuse of discretion where trial court granted “a short recess to consult with the victim and then allowing her to answer leading questions about the oral rape”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Green

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.