Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/15/2003
State v. Delaney
Citations
- 71 P.3d 93
- 187 Or. App. 717
- 2003 Ore. App. LEXIS 624
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- even assuming that a defendant's actions were so inept that her arrest and the discovery of the contraband were readily foreseeable consequences, she did not voluntarily introduce contraband into a detention center
- even assuming that a defendant’s actions were so inept that her arrest and the discovery of the contraband were readily foreseeable consequences, she did not voluntarily introduce contraband into a detention center
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edmonds, Kistler, Schuman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-06-26· cited 33×
- State v. EatonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-02-12· cited 19×
- State v. ThaxtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-11-05· cited 10×
- State v. Ortiz-ValdezCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-11-13· cited 2×
- Alex Trenton Beltz v. State of Alaska, State of Alaska v. Lesli Renee RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2024-06-07· cited 2×
- State v. HaydenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-09-17
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.