State v. Dejarlais

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Legislature has clearly indicated that there is a public interest in domestic violence protection orders.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Danny v. Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-10-03· cited 55×
• State v. Dejarlais
  Washington Supreme Court· 1998-12-24· cited 43×
• State v. Wilson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-01-09· cited 33×
• State v. Paulson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-02-07· cited 16×
• State v. Jacobs
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-05-26· cited 16×
• State v. Jacobs
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2000-06-16· cited 15×
• State v. Chapman
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-07-16· cited 2×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Salinas
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-05-21· cited 1,796×
• State v. Delmarter
  Washington Supreme Court· 1980-10-23· cited 583×
• State v. Hoffman
  Washington Supreme Court· 1991-01-10· cited 461×
• State v. Allery
  Washington Supreme Court· 1984-05-17· cited 198×
• State v. Riker
  Washington Supreme Court· 1994-03-03· cited 161×
• State v. Ciskie
  Washington Supreme Court· 1988-03-17· cited 137×
• State v. Jackson
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1996-07-12· cited 96×
• State v. Galisia
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-01-21· cited 53×
• State v. Young
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-12-22· cited 10×
• Reed v. Reed
  Washington Supreme Court· 1928-10-11· cited 9×
• State v. Cyrus
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1992-07-20· cited 8×