State v. DeCaro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ordering supplemental briefing regarding whether, in light of trial court’s finding regarding compliance with subpoena, judgment should be affirmed
• supplemental briefs regarding whether, in light of trial court’s finding regarding compliance with subpoena, judgment should be affirmed
• supplemental briefs regarding whether, in light of trial court's finding regarding compliance with subpoena, judgment should be affirmed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Honulik v. Town of Greenwich
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-10-13· cited 27×
• Gosselin v. Gosselin
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2008-09-09· cited 9×
• Hinds v. Commissioner of Correction
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2016-05-03

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal
  Supreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 1,404×
• State v. Decaro
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-02-29· cited 92×
• State v. Cerreta
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-05-21· cited 67×
• State v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-04-12· cited 30×