Supreme Court of Georgia· 4/13/1989
State v. Deason
Citations
- 378 S.E.2d 120
- 259 Ga. 183
- 1989 Ga. LEXIS 175
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting due process challenge to OCGA § 45-11-4, and expressly noting that the constitutionality of OCGA § 17-7-52 was not before the court
- rationale of OCGA § 45-11-4 is that government officials require protections of statute lest \their reputation and efficiency in office. . . be impaired while defending baseless charges\
- “[0]fficersaffordedthe privileges of OCGA § 45-11-4 have generally been, and presently are, county or municipal officers with broad governing power, who are vested with authority which requires them to exercise discretion”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hunt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dudley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2001-02-16· cited 23×
- Mapp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-06-24· cited 18×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia· 2010-01-25· cited 7×
- Lundy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-05-01· cited 5×
- Ellis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2016-11-30· cited 4×
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-03-16· cited 3×
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2001-05-07· cited 2×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1970-04-20· cited 3,777×
- McLennan v. AldredgeSupreme Court of Georgia· 1968-01-04· cited 41×
- Browning v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1985-06-27· cited 17×
- Axson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-03-12· cited 5×
- Dyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1909-11-09· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.