State v. Dearman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a sniff of a residence is a search requiring a warrant under the Washington constitution
• holding that a sniff of a residence is a search requiring a warrant under the Washington constitution
• holding that probable cause is required prior to canine sniff outside residential garage
• holding that probable cause is required prior to canine sniff outside residential garage
• concluding that a dog sniff “expose[d] information that could not have been obtained without the [use of the dog]” and therefore use of a trained narcotics dog at a residence constituted a search under the state constitution
• holding, inter alia, that canine sniff of residential garage was search under Washington constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).