State v. Day

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 1327

Syllabus

The trial court did not err when it denied the defendant-appellant's motion to dismiss the indictment on speedy trial grounds. Although a substantial delay occurred, defendant-appellant suffered no demonstrable prejudice as a result. The trial court did not err by failing to hold a hearing. It properly analyzed the speedy trial claim under Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972) and defendant-appellant has not pointed to any evidence that he was precluded from presenting to the trial court that would warrant remand. Assignments of error overruled judgment affirmed.