Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/14/1979
State v. Day
Citations
- 594 P.2d 1285
- 40 Or. App. 235
- 1979 Ore. App. LEXIS 2117
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendant in driving while suspended prosecution could not collaterally challenge the basis for underlying suspension
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwab, Tanzer, Richardson, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HardtCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-12-31· cited 13×
- State v. RiddellCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-02-28· cited 8×
- State v. DammanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1989-03-03· cited 2×
- State v. BennerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-10-15· cited 2×
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-10-12
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.