Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 5/24/1990
State v. Davis
Citations
- 133 N.H. 211
- 575 A.2d 4
- 1990 N.H. LEXIS 49
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court not required to make nice calculations of truthfulness of informant where other information in the affidavit supplied its own predicate for probable cause
- informant saw marijuana on defendant’s porch and in living quarters
- controlled buy not necessary for a finding of probable cause
- informant observed drugs at defendant’s residence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Souter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Atwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1991-09-20· cited 52×
- State v. SilvestriSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-12-29· cited 23×
- State v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-09-01· cited 19×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1995-12-28· cited 17×
- State v. DanielSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1997-05-28· cited 7×
- State v. FishSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1997-12-30· cited 6×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 8,679×
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-06-28· cited 1,806×
- State v. StearnsSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1988-06-06· cited 28×
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1988-12-09· cited 19×
- State v. HazenSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1988-12-09· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.