State v. Davis
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 2797
Syllabus
R.C. 2941.25 – ALLIED OFFENSES – ANIMUS – SENTENCING – MURDER – AGGRAVATED ROBBERY –EVIDENCE – SUFFICIENCY AND WEIGHT: Where the offenses of murder and aggravated robbery were committed with a separate animus, the trial court did not err in imposing separate sentences for each offense pursuant to R.C. 2941.25. Defendant's convictions for felony murder and aggravated robbery were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the evidence showed that defendant planned to rob the victim, approached the victim with a firearm and demanded money, and shot the victim when the victim reached for his own weapon and where the trial court specifically stated that defendant's account of the events and defendant's alibi witness were not credible.
Judges: Myers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- State v. RuffOhio Supreme Court· 2015-03-25· cited 912×
- State v. RogersOhio Supreme Court· 2015-06-24· cited 703×
- State v. LoganOhio Supreme Court· 1979-12-19· cited 696×
- State v. Walker (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-12-23· cited 255×
- State v. ShepardOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-26· cited 19×
- State v. ParhamOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-02-05· cited 13×
- State v. PettusOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-24· cited 13×
- State v. MerzOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-06-23· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.