State v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there is no bright-line rule favoring either retail or wholesale value in ordering restitution
• “restitution should be provided only up to the amount of the victim’s loss” [citing Hunziker, 274 Kan. at 663-64]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Huff
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2014-10-24· cited 16×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2014-08-22· cited 2×

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ward
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2011-07-29· cited 1,316×
• Wolfe Electric, Inc. v. Duckworth
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2011-10-21· cited 193×
• Illinois Central Railroad v. Crail
  Supreme Court· 1930-02-24· cited 118×
• Johnson v. Westhoff Sand Co.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2006-06-09· cited 70×
• State v. Hunziker
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2002-10-25· cited 69×
• State v. Casto
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1996-03-15· cited 55×
• State v. Applegate
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1999-03-05· cited 46×
• State v. Dexter
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2003-12-19· cited 42×
• State v. Beechum
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1992-05-22· cited 25×
• State v. Horton
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2011-07-15· cited 21×
• The United States of America v. Fred Cummings
  Tenth Circuit· 1986-08-13· cited 17×
• In Re the Marriage of Takusagawa
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2007-09-07· cited 17×
• State v. Parker
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2012-08-10· cited 16×
• State v. Hall
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2011-02-11· cited 15×
• State v. Allen
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1996-05-31· cited 14×
• State v. Behrendt
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2012-04-27· cited 5×
• State v. Sammons
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2003-10-31· cited 3×