State v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ‘boating under the influence’ under Florida law applies to opera- tion of nonmotorized vessels, and citing with approval Howard’s holding that bicycles qualify as ‘vehicles’ under [Fla. Stat. Ann.] § 316.193
• construing “vessel” as having the same definition of “boat” as defined in the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES— REPORT NO. 2013-03
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2014-08-28· cited 17×
• In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases-Report 2017-09.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2018-03-08· cited 4×
• In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES-INSTRUCTIONS 7.8, 7.8(A), and 11.1-11.6(A)
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2016-04-14· cited 3×
• In Re STANDARD JURY INSTRUCTIONS IN CRIMINAL CASES-REPORT NO. 2015-07
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2016-05-12· cited 3×
• In Re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—Report No. 2016-08
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2017-02-23· cited 3×
• State v. King
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2021-04-20· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co.
  Supreme Court· 2005-02-22· cited 221×
• Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach
  Supreme Court· 2013-01-15· cited 107×
• State v. Anderson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-08-09· cited 19×
• State v. Howard
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-06-23· cited 6×
• State v. Nicholson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-06-19· cited 4×
• State v. Higdon
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-04-19· cited 2×