Skip to main content

State v. Davis

Citations

  • 160 Wash. App. 471

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • superseded by statute on other grounds as recognized by In re Pers. Restraint of Combs, 176 Wn. App. 112, 308 P.3d 763 (2013) (“A [scrivener’s error] is one that, when amended, would correctly convey the intention of the court based on other evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Worswick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.