Supreme Court of Connecticut· 4/2/2019
State v. Davis
Citations
- 203 A.3d 1233
- 331 Conn. 239
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- de novo review was undertaken when fac- tual findings were not challenged and claim was that those findings did not support conclusion that police had reasonable and articulable suspicion that defendant was engaged in criminal activity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robinson, Palmer, McDonald, D'Auria, Mullins, Ecker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 5,118×
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 3,282×
- Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court· 2000-03-28· cited 1,787×
- Florida v. JLSupreme Court· 2000-03-28· cited 1,350×
- Prado Navarette v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2014-04-22· cited 1,110×
- United States v. Wade Allen WheatEighth Circuit· 2001-12-28· cited 122×
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-01-30· cited 89×
- State v. GolottaSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2003-12-16· cited 86×
- United States v. Shawn LoweThird Circuit· 2015-07-02· cited 66×
- United States v. Stanley Lewis JonesFifth Circuit· 1980-06-19· cited 49×
- State v. MannSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-10-05· cited 44×
- State v. BurroughsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-09-23· cited 37×
- State v. HammondSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-08-21· cited 33×
- Braveheart v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2005-03-28· cited 32×
- State v. BattsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-03-20· cited 30×
- United States v. Rio Hatton JonesTenth Circuit· 1993-07-14· cited 27×
- United States v. WatsonSeventh Circuit· 2018-08-17· cited 24×
- Post v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District (California, Real Party in Interest)Supreme Court· 2002-10-07· cited 19×
- State v. BentonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-05-29· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.