State v. Davis
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 1651
Syllabus
Defendant-appellant was convicted of rape in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b) and kidnapping in violation of R.C. 2905.01(A)(4). The trial court committed plain error by not ordering the merger of the rape and kidnapping counts. The merger conclusion renders Defendant-appellant's argument regarding the trial court's imposition of consecutive sentences moot. The trial court did not err by allowing the State to cross-examine Defendant-appellant about the notice of alibi he filed but did not pursue. The trial court erred by allowing the submission of victim impact evidence, but, given the overwhelming evidence of Defendant-appellant's guilt, the error was harmless. Finally, the admission of other acts evidence was elicited by defense counsel, and, thus, the trial court did not err regarding the admission of this testimony. Judgment affirmed, in part, reversed, in part, and remanded.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. RuffOhio Supreme Court· 2015-03-25· cited 912×
- State v. RogersOhio Supreme Court· 2015-06-24· cited 703×
- State v. LoganOhio Supreme Court· 1979-12-19· cited 696×
- State v. BrewerOhio Supreme Court· 2009-02-18· cited 157×
- State v. FautenberryOhio Supreme Court· 1995-07-05· cited 146×
- State v. OllisonOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-20· cited 25×
- State v. LundyOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-21· cited 14×
- State v. MpanurwaOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-12-08· cited 9×
- State v. DuncanOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-10-06· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.