State v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an “order to stop is not necessarily equivalent to placing a person under arrest”
• explaining that an officer stating, “Stop, police! You are under arrest,” is sufficient to place a person in “custody” for purposes of the escape statute
• observ- ing that, although the evidence was sufficient to establish that officers had placed the defendant under constructive restraint, it could not support a finding that it had been pur- suant to an arrest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Eastep
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2017-08-10· cited 22×
• Growing Green Panda v. Dept. of Human Services
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-02-20· cited 4×
• State v. McColly
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2019-02-28· cited 3×
• State v. Markwell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-21· cited 2×
• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-08-11

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Gaines
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
• State v. Rodgers
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-02-11· cited 194×
• State v. Ashbaugh
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-12-09· cited 161×
• Engweiler v. Persson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-12-12· cited 27×
• State v. Lonergan
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-01-25· cited 14×
• State v. Waterhouse
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-05-05· cited 14×
• State v. McClure
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-07-09· cited 4×
• State v. McVay
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-06-05· cited 3×