Supreme Court of North Carolina· 6/5/1840
State v. . Davis
Citations
- 23 N.C. 125
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[P]ossession alone is sufficient to maintain an action of trespass against mere tort feasors.\
- \[P]ossession alone is sufficient to maintain an action of trespass against mere tort feasors.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gaston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Dunbar Corp. v. LindseyFourth Circuit· 1990-06-08· cited 61×
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1972-11-21· cited 36×
- United States v. Rodney VinsonFourth Circuit· 2015-11-03· cited 31×
- Burgess v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1923-01-18· cited 29×
- State v. . NeelySupreme Court of North Carolina· 1876-01-05· cited 13×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1972-08-15· cited 10×
- Stoutmire v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1978-05-02· cited 6×
- United States v. KellyW.D. North Carolina· 2013-01-07· cited 2×
- Dunbar Corporation v. LindseyFourth Circuit· 1990-06-19· cited 1×
- Odom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1981-03-31· cited 1×
- Whichard v. CH Mortg. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-06-21
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.